Video - ThoughtWorks Cruise at Chicago ALT.NET
This video was captured at the Chicago ALT.NET August 13th meeting. This first video is the Cruise presentation.
This video was captured at the Chicago ALT.NET August 13th meeting. This first video is the Cruise presentation.
This month's Chicago ALT.NET meeting was pretty awesome and it was all caught in video. As soon as I have some time to do some post-production on the raw material (read, just stitch pieces together) I'll make it available somehow.
As previously mentioned we started off with a presentation of ThoughtWorks Cruise, where Robert Norton explained the idea of CI server, Agents, Pipelines and went through many of Cruise features, system requirements, and futures. He also clarified his company's position regarding CruiseControl.net, which will most likely not receive a lot of attention in terms of funding, being left for the community to keep it going.
Cruise seemed promising to me but it's clearly a typical version 1 product that needs some work to get enthusiastic thumbs up from me. Hopefully they move quickly and release a few updates before the year is over to make the product top notch. I don't mean to say Cruise in unusable. It's definitely usable and does things in a very smart way. Given time I'm sure they will take care of the rough edges and have a chance to answer customer feedback. My particular concerns tend to be on the side of ability to integrate with other systems in the enterprise, like your bug/feature tracker.
After the presentation portion we all sat together for an open discussion. The fallback topic was CI practices but what the group really wanted to talk about was Agile teams and their dynamics, so that's what the discussion became. As usual, that's my favorite part of the meeting and it's a pity that only 50% of the attendance stuck around for it.
It's nice when you go to a meeting like this and can take home a lot of new knowledge.
I'm about to configure a new development machine this week. It's going to be my 3rd install from scratch in the last 12 months, which I know is not all that much, but certainly more than I wish I had to.
Besides the common software development tools, like Visual Studio, SQL Server, Ruby, Office, Firefox, SVN, etc, over the years I've collected a number of small tools that I make sure are installed before I start doing anything else.
The list is volatile but some utilities have been there for years. Here's my current list in no particular order:
What about you? Do you have tools that you feel naked without?
I have this small personal organizer application that helps me keeping track of where my hard earned money is going. There's nothing special about this application other that it was designed to be used only by myself and it works exactly the way I think it should.
This application has been a trusty companion for the last 10 years and it needs its well deserved retirement. This is the last piece of VB6 that I have installed on my system. Since I stopped installing Visual Studio 6 years ago, this means I have been dealing with a couple of known bugs. I also have not added any new feature in a long time (maybe since the year 2000).
This year I decided to finally rewrite this app in .Net and I have an interesting choice to make. The old app uses MS Access for its database and, while I know I could very well keep using Access, I just don't want to deal with Access anymore. It's a technology from the last century and I think there must be something better out there.
A few things I need the database to support:
After a brief research I chose a few candidates that seemed convenient: SQLce (because of my familiarity with SQL Server) and SQLite (because it's everywhere, comes on the mac, trivial to install in Linux, it's the new Rails 2.0 default database).
As I'm increasingly living in a multi-platform environment, I think I'm leaning towards SQLite, but I'll welcome other suggestions that fit in the requirements.
I'll return to this topic with my findings and overall development experience with the chosen database in the near future. For now I'll leave these useful SQLite links.
It's not uncommon for an enterprise application to need some form of background processes to do continuous work. These could be tasks such as
For many of these things there are dedicated tools that provide that feature, like a reporting service (SSRS or BO,) scripts that run in the email server, or even simple executables that are fired by the Windows Task Scheduler. When you have only one or two background tasks, using something like the task scheduler may be OK, but administration quickly becomes painful when the number of tasks grows. The dedicated services like SSRS or BO can be overkill depending on the size of your application or organization.
One approach I like to take is to create a Windows Service for the application, grouping all the different background tasks under a single project, a single .exe, and a single configuration file. Visual Studio has always had a Windows Service project type, but the process of creating a working service is not as simple as you would hope, especially when your service performs more than one independent task.
After creating a couple of services, I realized that I definitely needed to stash all that monkey work somewhere I could just reuse later. I decided to create a helper library to assist creating and maintaining Windows services.
The library doesn't help with all kinds of Windows services, but has helped me a lot with the type of tasks I explained above. The key to the library is the ITask
interface.
public interface ITask: IDisposable { bool Started { get; } string Name { get; } void Start(); void Stop(); void Execute(); }
This interface shown all that is needed to create a task that can be started, stopped, and invoked by the service process. But this interface has too many members and many tasks are common enough that these members will be implemented almost identically. For example, tasks that execute on a regular interval will be almost identical, the only different member will be the Execute
method. That's why the library comes with some handy base classes as shown in this diagram.
Now when I need to implement a task that runs repeatedly I simply inherit a task from PeriodicalTask
or ScheduledTask
as seen below. These classes will be part of my service project, from which I remove all the other classes that were added by default.
class CleanupTask : PeriodicalTask { readonly static log4net.ILog Log = log4net.LogManager.GetLogger( System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType); public override void Execute() { //time to run.... //TODO: write the actual code here // ShoppingCart.DeleteAbandonedCarts(); Log.InfoFormat("Executed: {0}", this.GetType().Name); } } class DailyReportTask : ScheduledTask { readonly static log4net.ILog Log = log4net.LogManager.GetLogger( System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType); protected override void Execute(DateTime scheduledDate) { //time to run.... //TODO: write the actual code here // SalesReport.SendDailySummary(); Log.InfoFormat("Executed: {0}", this.GetType().Name); } }
Instead of hard coding the interval or the scheduled time of the above tasks, we use the service's .config file for that:
<WindowsService> <tasks> <task name="CleanupTask" interval="600" /> <task name="DailyReportTask" time="21:30" /> </tasks> </WindowsService>
There are only a few more things we need to do to get this service ready. First we need to add a new WindowsService
item. Here we are naming it MyAppService
and making it inherit from from SPServiceBase
.
partial class MyAppService : SPServiceBase { public const string MyAppSvcName = "MyAppSVC"; public MyAppService() { InitializeComponent(); //Important.. use the constant here AFTER // the call to InitializeComponent() this.ServiceName = MyAppSvcName; } }
We also need to add an Installer Class, which I'll name simply Installer
and which will be invoked during the service installation phase to add the appropriate registry entries to make the service be listed in the Services applet. Here's how this class looks like. Note that it inherits from another base class from the library.
[RunInstaller(true)] public class Installer : SergioPereira.WindowsService.ServiceInstaller { //That's all we need. Hooray! }
I mentioned that the installer will add the necessary registry information. Some of that are the name and description of the service. We provide that with an assembly attribute that you can put in the AssemblyInfo.cs or anywhere you like in a .cs file (outside any class or namespace.)
[assembly: ServiceRegistration( SampleService.MyAppService.MyAppSvcName, // <-- just a string constant "MyApp Support Service", "Supports the MyApp application performing several " + "critical background tasks.") ]
A Windows service is compiled as an .exe, so it needs an en entry point, a static Main
function. Let's add a Program.cs like this:
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { if (!SelfInstaller.ProcessIntallationRequest(args)) { MyAppService svc = new MyAppService(); svc.AddTask(new CleanupTask()); svc.AddTask(new DailyReportTask()); //add more tasks if you have them svc.Run(); } } }
The code above is pretty simple, we are creating the tasks and telling our service to take care of them. Then we start the service. The interesting thing is the call to ProcessIntallationRequest
. This is where we added the self-installing capability of the service. If you wrote a service in the past, you know that they get installed by using InstallUtil.exe. One potential problem is that InstallUtil.exe may not be present on the server or not in the PATH, making an scripted installation a little more complicated. Instead, by using the that call from SelfInstaller
, we enabled our service to be invoked like the following to install or uninstall it (remember to execute as an Administrator).
SampleService.exe -i[nstall] SampleService.exe -u[ninstall]
After installing it, you should see the service in the Services applet.
Here's the final structure of our project.
If you want, download the library source code along with a sample service project. There's more in the library than I have time to explain here, including an auto-update task and extra configuration properties for each task.